As the statistics continue to show, the percentage of residences occupied by renters, versus those occupied by owners, continues to grow to the highest levels since World War II. In 2005, the rate of homeownership was over 69%, and has now fallen to 63%. Although there are 2 million more homes now than just a year ago, ownership decreased by about 400,000, while rentals increased by almost 2 million (WSJ, July 28, 2015). The logic behind that trend is fairly easy to understand: an increasing number of Millennials leaving their parents’ homes, a suspect economy, painful memories of the imploded real estate bubble, and housing stock that “just seems too expensive”. The logic of renting gives the renter a good deal of flexibility, with the obvious downside of no true ownership, equity or interest write-offs.
As we hit the time of year, the fall, where we the shoppers are aplenty, and the new customer deals SEEM illogical, we just need to wonder how many oil dealers are “renting” customers, when they think they are buying them. If you are spending hard-earned marketing dollars to acquire new customers, it might pay to have a better idea as to the real VALUE of that acquired customer, and how to maximize that value.
Typically, customers choose a (new) dealer due to a specific price offer at a time when the customer is “willing to listen”. Very often customers are not the evil shoppers that they are made out to be, but rather they are approached with an offer that seems well better than how they perceive their current dealers’ offer, and their interest is piqued. We all know how this story ends, and that is with the customers choosing the offer with the most freebies – lowest price, free service contract, etc.
So, imagine that you are a dealer who has just made this “lowest offer”, and been lucky enough to acquire a, hopefully credit-worthy, new customer. This point is where there is often a logical disconnect in the mind of the new dealer. The disconnect goes like this:
- The customer is paying a full margin to another dealer
- I will entice him/her to buy from me with a real low-ball offer
- The customers will stay with me when I raise my prices to full margin, and won’t look elsewhere.
This logic, a/k/a chasing your tail, is why attrition numbers are so high, acquisition costs keep increasing, and customers keep shopping.
If the customers stay for shorter periods of time, especially recently acquired customers, what should be done? The first thing that would be suggested would be to get to know your customer. Are higher credit score customers better than those with lower credit scores? Don’t answer that so quickly. Will tank monitors make customers feel comfortable enough that when the “next great offer” comes along, they will be willing to NOT listen to it? Does “better service” really matter?
The more you get to know your customers, their motivations and their behavior, the better you will be at assessing how much money you should be willing to spend to acquire new customers.
It has been proven, time and time again, that customers who are on price cap programs are more likely to remain with their dealers than those who are not on programs. However, even with that information, many companies are inconsistent with their program offers. Some wait “’til the time is right” (the answer is that the lowest price of the year happens EXACTLY once per year – the other 364 days have higher prices). Others switch between offering a cap, and offering a fixed-price and then (sometimes) offering nothing. Considering that the price of oil ALWAYS has a 50/50 chance of going up (or down), it seems to be a very big bet to tell your customers that this won’t be the year that prices will go up.
If you can offer pricing programs to cut down (nothing will eliminate shopping) on customer attrition, track customer behavior via the data that you already have in your back-office systems, and learn to value customers based upon their value to you – you can then move from being an overpaying renter to a savvy buyer.
Disclaimer: When applicable, advice from Angus Energy may include a discussion about risk mitigation via commodity and/or weather hedging. PAST RESULTS ARE NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS. The risk of loss in trading commodity interests can be substantial. You should therefore carefully consider whether such trading is suitable for you in light of your financial condition. In considering whether to trade or to authorize someone else to trade for you, you should be aware that you could lose all or substantially all of your investment and may be liable for amounts well above your initial investment.